Multicriteria decision analysis technique and their properties. As with all alcohol and other drug use, taking mdma carries risks, albeit comparatively lower than most other drugs. Article information, pdf download for european rating of drug harms, open. We aimed to apply multicriteria decision analysis mcda modelling to a.
Forty drug experts from throughout the eu scored 20 drugs on 16 harm criteria. David j nutt, leslie a king, lawrence d phillips, on behalf of the independent scientific. Proper assessment of the harms caused by the misuse of drugs can inform policy makers in health, policing, and social care. Multicriteria decision analysis of drug harms in the uk and. The aim of this study was to obtain a comprehensive consensus from addiction experts in scotland on the relative harms of drug misuse, both legal and illegal using the ranking system developed by nutt et al. European rating of drug harms jan van amsterdam, david. Alcohol most harmful drug, according to multicriteria. Using a multicriteria decision analysis approach where different harm criteria, for example, acute overdose, injury, family adversity were weighted relative to their importance, alcohol was ranked as the most harmful drug overall. Nov 01, 2010 multicriteria decision analysis the new analysis uses nine criteria that relate to the harms that a drug produces in the individual and seven to the harms to others both in the uk and overseas. This approach could provide a basis for exploring and formulating recommendations to ministers as part of the structure of acmd reports.
More harmful drugs are called hard drugs 1, and less harmful drugs are called soft drugs. We also argued for a more sophisticated analysis in which drug benefits would also be taken into account. Frontiers toward an improved multicriteria drug harm. This creates a unique ratio scale for each criterion. The model provides a conceptual framework for further consideration and refinement.
The report concluded that ecigarettes are 95% less harmful than conventional cigarettes, advice which was subsequently used in a report by public. The ones marked may be different from the article in the profile. Mcda modelling showed that heroin, crack cocaine, and metamfetamine were the most harmful drugs to individuals part scores 34, 37, and 32, respectively, whereas alcohol, heroin, and crack cocaine were the most harmful to others 46, 21, and 17, respectively. Unfortunately, in many cases, the harms of criminalization of drug users substantially exceeds the harms from the drug use itself. Aug 20, 2018 the initial multicriteria drug harm scale proposal. The most comprehensive work quantifying drug harms was conducted by nutt et al 1 2 in the uk. Nov 06, 2010 we aimed to apply multicriteria decision analysis mcda modelling to a range of drug harms in the uk. Pdf substance use communication between looked after. Questioning the method and utility of ranking drug harms in drug policy. Quantifying the rr of harm to self and others from. Multicriteria decision analysis of drug harms in the uk. Substance abuse, also known as drug abuse, is use of a drug in amounts or by methods which are harmful to the individual or others. Marijuana acceptance and use among older adults are increasing.
Longterm effects of ecstasy are still under investigation. Owing in part to criticism over the arbitrary weighting of the factors in the 2007 study, the new study employed a multiplecriteria decision analysis procedure and found that alcohol is more harmful to society than both heroin and crack, while heroin, crack, and methamphetamine are the most harmful drugs to individuals. To do this, the research team used a technique called a multicriteria decision analysis mcda. Members of the independent scientific committee on drugs, including two invited specialists, met in a 1day interactive. Multicriteria decision analysis is a technique that uses decision matrix to provide a systematic analytical approach for establishing criteria, such as risk levels, uncertainty, and valuation, to evaluate and rank many ideas.
While there is a growing literature on the categorization and analysis of drug. The acmd has explored the use of a multicriteria decision analysis mcda model for evaluating drug harms. The initial multicriteria drug harm scale proposal. Overall, alcohol was the most harmful drug overall harm score 72, with heroin 55 and crack cocaine 54 in second and third places. An alternative multicriteria decision analysis proposed by nutt et al 2007. Europe 20 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 20 40 60 80 europe uk r 0. More harmful drugs are called hard drugs, and less harmful drugs are called soft drugs. The present paper describes the results of a rating study performed by a group of european union eu drug experts using the multicriteria decision analysis model for evaluating drug harms. This cited by count includes citations to the following articles in scholar. The multicriteria drug harm scale mcdhs has been proposed as a solution to this problem nutt et al. According to the national survey of drug use and health nsduh, between 2002 and 2017, prioryear marijuana use rates increased from 2. Will growth in cryptomarket drug buying increase the harms of. The term soft drug is considered controversial by its critics as it may imply that soft drugs cause no or insignificant harm. Phillips, on behalf of the independent scientific committee on drugs medicine.
Will growth in cryptomarket drug buying increase the harms. Drug harmfulness is the degree to which a psychoactive drug is harmful to a user and is measured in various ways, such as by addictiveness and the potential for physical harm. Drugs that cause most harm scoring drugs graphic detail. Since then he has been the edmond j safra chair in neuropsychopharmacology at imperial college london and. Drug related deaths in england and walesthat is, those with an underlying cause of drug misuse, dependence, or poisoningare running at a record 3674 a year, with 2479 related to illegal drug use alone. Alcohol most harmful drug based on multicriteria analysis. This task is not easy because of the wide range of ways in which drugs can cause harm. We aimed to apply multicriteria decision analysis mcda modelling to a range of drug harms in the uk. Drug harms in the uk articles drug harms in the uk a. For example, in the paper that prompted the caulkins et al. The researchers say that it is important for policy makers in health, policing and social care to have good guidance on the harms of drugs. Until 2009, he was a professor at the university of bristol heading their psychopharmacology unit. Using a similar multicriteria decision analysis process as the 2010 drug harm ranking, drugscience looked to rank the harms of all nicotinecontaining products, including cigarettes, cigars, nicotine patches and ecigarettes. Participants collectively defined regulatory regimes and identified outcome criteria reflecting ethical and normative concerns.
The australian drug harms ranking study yvonne bonomo. The idea behind the scale is that qualitative methodology, such as the delphi method which entails consulting experts separately to rate drug harms without disclosing the identity of the expert pool in the process and consensus. They obviously exist, otherwise drug use would be far more rare than it is. How changes to drug prohibition could be good for the uk. Swingweights equate the units of harm on all the criteria. Method members of the independent scientific committee on drugs, including two invited specialists, met in a 1day interactive workshop to score 20 drugs on. Methods members of the independent scientific committee on drugs, including two invited specialists, met in a 1day interactive workshop to score 20 drugs on 16 criteria. Method members of the independent scientific committee on drugs. Alcohol most harmful drug, according to multicriteria analysis. Experts on drug harms, addiction, criminology and drug policy were invited to a decision conference to develop a multicriterion decision analysis mcda model for appraising alternative regulatory regimes. As with all alcohol and other drug use, taking mdma. Members of the independent scientific committee on drugs, including two invited specialists, met in a 1day interactive workshop to score 20 drugs on 16 criteria.
Pdf substance use communication between looked after young. David john nutt born 16 april 1951 is an english neuropsychopharmacologist specialising in the research of drugs that affect the brain and conditions such as addiction, anxiety, and sleep. Union eu drug experts using the multicriteria decision analysis model for. A multicriteria decision analysis the iscds first published work, launched in the lancet on 1 november 2010, has.
The expert group also assessed criteria weights that would apply, on average, across the eu. To provide better guidance to policy makers in health, policing, and social care, the harms that drugs cause need to be properly assessed. These harms are clustered into five subgroups representing physical, psychological, and social harms. Toward an improved multicriteria drug harm assessment. David j nutt, leslie a king, lawrence d phillips, on behalf of the independent scienti.
Differing definitions of drug abuse are used in public health, medical and criminal justice contexts. The new analysis uses nine criteria that relate to the harms that a drug produces in the individual and seven to the harms to others both in the uk and overseas. A new approach to formulating and appraising drug policy. Method members of the independent scientific committee on drugs, including two invited specialists, met in a 1day interactive workshop to score 20 drugs on 16 criteria. Harms to the consumer mortalit y risk of lethal overdose drugspeci. Background proper assessment of the harms caused by the misuse of drugs can inform policy makers in health, policing, and social care. European rating of drug harms jan van amsterdam, david nutt. Multicriteria decision analysis the new analysis uses nine criteria that relate to the harms that a drug produces in the individual and seven to the harms to others both in the uk and overseas. Potential harms of marijuana use among older adults. Some researchers suggest that slight brain changes may result from heavy use, but the evidence is far from conclusive. In some cases criminal or antisocial behaviour occurs when the person is under the influence of a drug, and long term.
488 555 158 691 738 339 1117 306 44 32 203 1265 241 1329 509 392 9 347 735 845 831 338 717 1320 1165 589 537 771 1450 1224 1227 69 198 1498 1095